In
the article “America Needs an Alternative Maximum Tax” John Cochrane,professor
of finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business in the April
15, 2013
issue of the Wall Street Journal argued that the US needs a Alternative Maximum
Tax. Within the article he also brings up another point about taxation, which
will be summed up here in the interest of short space allotted. The
modern political debate on taxes finds law makers unwilling to give up programs
and funding and so they are sorely tempted to increase taxes. “Make all pay
their fair share!”, is often their cry. Certainly in justice we should all pay
taxes, but how much is often the question. When does the percentage of taxation
become over burdening? Those in Europe, for example many of the northern
European countries find income tax to be greater than 50% of their incomes.
They argue that in return they receive better services. Yet if for example we
had a 100% income tax rate, then no one would work—there would be no
incentive—and we would all expect to have services from the now bankrupt
government. Should someone making more than a certain amount be forced to pay
an exuberant amount of taxes as “their fair share”? It should be remembered
that on top of this percentage there is of course all the other taxes small and
large that must be paid. Of course there is always the classic argument that if
the rich are overtaxed then there will be no economic growth. Of course the AMT
is slowing creeping in and doing exactly this, but not just to the rich. Soon
those who are making $100,000 are becoming eligible to have the AMT applied to
them. Yet, what if the AMT strangles these households (as it is not adjusted to
inflation)? When will they start to be paying far more than “their fair share”?
A socialized America will be slow to take care.
No comments:
Post a Comment